Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2006

Mitx, Ltd., White Reno Investors, Ltd., and Wells Reno Investors, Ltd. v. Gordon S. Swift Consulting Engineer, Inc.

Mitx, Ltd., White Reno Investors, Ltd., and Wells Reno Investors, Ltd. v. Gordon S. Swift Consulting Engineer, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided September 21, 2006

Mitx, Ltd., White Reno Investors, Ltd., and Wells Reno Investors, Ltd. v. Gordon S. Swift Consulting Engineer, Inc.

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-06-225-CV

MITX, LTD., WHITE RENO INVESTORS, LTD., APPELLANTS

AND WELLS RENO INVESTORS, LTD.

V.

GORDON S. SWIFT CONSULTING ENGINEER, INC. APPELLEE

----------

FROM THE 236 TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION (footnote: 1) AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered “Appellants’ Amended Notice Of Dismissal Of Appeal.”  It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.   See T EX. R. A PP. P. 42.1(a)(2), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the appellants, for which let execution issue.   See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL D: HOLMAN, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED:  September 21, 2006

FOOTNOTES

1:

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.