Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2006

Mitx, Ltd., White Reno Investors, Ltd., and Wells Reno Investors, Ltd. v. Gordon S. Swift Consulting Engineer, Inc.

Mitx, Ltd., White Reno Investors, Ltd., and Wells Reno Investors, Ltd. v. Gordon S. Swift Consulting Engineer, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided September 21, 2006

Mitx, Ltd., White Reno Investors, Ltd., and Wells Reno Investors, Ltd. v. Gordon S. Swift Consulting Engineer, Inc.

Opinion

 

 

 

 

 

 

                           COURT OF APPEALS

                                       SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                                   FORT WORTH

 

                                        NO. 2-06-225-CV

 

MITX, LTD., WHITE RENO INVESTORS, LTD.,                        APPELLANTS

AND WELLS RENO INVESTORS, LTD.                                                     

 

                                                   V.

 

GORDON S. SWIFT CONSULTING ENGINEER, INC.                       APPELLEE

 

                                               ----------

            FROM THE 236TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

                                               ----------

                  MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT

                                               ----------

We have considered AAppellants= Amended Notice Of Dismissal Of Appeal.@  It is the court=s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the appellants, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL D:   HOLMAN, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

 


DELIVERED:  September 21, 2006



[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.