Zechariah Lavan Coleman v. State
Zechariah Lavan Coleman v. State
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 2-05-480-CR
ZECHARIAH LAVAN COLEMAN APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE
----------
FROM THE 213 TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
----------
MEMORANDUM OPINION (footnote: 1) AND JUDGMENT
----------
We have considered the “Motion To Dismiss Appeal” filed by Zechariah Lavan Coleman, pro se. The motion complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R. App . P. 42.2(a). No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. (footnote: 2) See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f).
PER CURIAM
PANEL D: WALKER, J., CAYCE, C.J.; and MCCOY, J.
DO NOT PUBLISH
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
DELIVERED: AUGUST 17, 2006
FOOTNOTES
1:
See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4
2:
Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw, and brief in support thereof, stating the appeal is frivolous under the guidelines of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). Because appellant has voluntarily dismissed his appeal, we need not address counsel’s motion.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.