Vincent Neil Pinner v. Snowe Ray Pinner
Vincent Neil Pinner v. Snowe Ray Pinner
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 2-05-406-CV
VINCENT NEIL PINNER APPELLANT
V.
SNOWE RAY PINNER APPELLEE
----------
FROM THE 322 nd DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
----------
MEMORANDUM OPINION (footnote: 1) AND JUDGMENT
----------
On July 21, 2006, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as required by T EX. R. A PP. P. 38.6(a). We stated we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. We have not received any response.
Because appellant’s brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).
Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.
PER CURIAM
PANEL D: MCCOY, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and LIVINGSTON, J.
DELIVERED: August 10, 2006
FOOTNOTES
1:
See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.