Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2006

Vincent Neil Pinner v. Snowe Ray Pinner

Vincent Neil Pinner v. Snowe Ray Pinner
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided August 10, 2006

Vincent Neil Pinner v. Snowe Ray Pinner

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-05-406-CV

VINCENT NEIL PINNER APPELLANT

V.

SNOWE RAY PINNER APPELLEE

----------

FROM THE 322 nd DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION (footnote: 1) AND JUDGMENT

----------

On July 21, 2006, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as required by T EX. R. A PP. P. 38.6(a).  We stated we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.  We have not received any response.

Because appellant’s brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.   See T EX . R. A PP . P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL D: MCCOY, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and LIVINGSTON, J.

DELIVERED:  August 10, 2006

FOOTNOTES

1:

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.