Ted William Reemtsma v. State
Ted William Reemtsma v. State
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 2-05-429-CR
TED WILLIAM REEMTSMA APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE
------------
FROM THE 372ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
------------
MEMORANDUM OPINION[1]
------------
Ted William Reemtsma appeals the trial court=s judgment revoking his community supervision for felony driving while intoxicated. In a single issue, appellant complains that the trial court erred by ordering him to pay a $1000 fine as a condition of parole. The State concedes that the trial court was without authority to order repayment of a fine as a condition of parole.[2] Accordingly, we sustain appellant=s issue and modify the trial court=s judgment to omit the provision in the judgment requiring appellant to pay a $1000 fine as a condition of parole.[3] We affirm the trial court=s judgment as modified.[4]
PER CURIAM
PANEL F: CAYCE, C.J.; WALKER and MCCOY, JJ.
DO NOT PUBLISH
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
DELIVERED: August 10, 2006
[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
[2]See Slaughter v. State, Nos. 02-04-00050-CR, 02-04-00051-CR, 2005 WL 183142, at *1 (Tex. App.CFort Worth Jan. 27, 2005, no pet.) (mem. op.) (not designated for publication); Green v. State, Nos. 02-03-00377-CR, 02-03-00397-CR, 2005 WL 78326, at *4 (Tex. App.CFort Worth Jan. 13, 2005, no pet.) (mem. op.) (not designated for publication) (both holding same).
[3]Belt v. State, 127 S.W.3d 277, 281 (Tex. App.CFort Worth 2004, no pet.); Green, 2005 WL 78326, at *4.
[4]See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.