Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2006

Robert Carlton Austin III v. State

Robert Carlton Austin III v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided April 6, 2006

Robert Carlton Austin III v. State

Opinion

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                COURT OF APPEALS

                                       SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                                   FORT WORTH

 

 

                                        NO. 2-06-048-CR

 

 

ROBERT CARLTON AUSTIN III                                               APPELLANT

 

                                                   V.

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS                                                                STATE

 

                                              ------------

 

           FROM THE 371ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

 

                                              ------------

 

                                MEMORANDUM OPINION[1]

 

                                              ------------

 


        Appellant Robert Carlton Austin III, pro se, attempts to appeal his 1993 conviction for aggravated sexual assault of a child under fourteen years of age. In accordance with a plea bargain, the trial court sentenced Austin to thirty years= confinement.  We will dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.       Pursuant to rule 26.2 of the rules of appellate procedure, a notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after the date sentence is imposed or within ninety days after the date sentence is imposed if the defendant files a timely motion for new trial.  Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a).  The trial court imposed Austin=s sentence on February 1, 1993.  However, Austin did not file his notice of appeal until February 14, 2006.

On February 22, 2006, we notified Austin of our concern that we lacked jurisdiction over this appeal because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.  We informed him that the appeal was subject to dismissal unless we received a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 44.3.  Austin did not respond to our letter.

A timely notice of appeal is essential to vest this court with jurisdiction.  See Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).  Because Austin=s notice of appeal was untimely, we have no jurisdiction over this appeal.  See id. at 526.  Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

 

PANEL D:   WALKER, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and MCCOY, J.

 

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

 

DELIVERED: April 6, 2006



[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.