Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2006

Finova Capital Corporation v. Joe B. Rupe, O.D., P.C. and Joe B. Rupe

Finova Capital Corporation v. Joe B. Rupe, O.D., P.C. and Joe B. Rupe
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided January 26, 2006

Finova Capital Corporation v. Joe B. Rupe, O.D., P.C. and Joe B. Rupe

Opinion

 

 

 

 

 

 

                           COURT OF APPEALS

                                       SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                                   FORT WORTH

 

                                        NO. 2-05-225-CV

 

FINOVA CAPITAL CORPORATION                                          APPELLANT

 

                                                   V.

 

JOE B. RUPE, O.D., P.C. AND JOE B. RUPE                              APPELLEES

 

                                               ----------

             FROM THE 78TH DISTRICT COURT OF WICHITA COUNTY

                                               ----------

                  MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT

                                               ----------

We have considered AAppellant, Finova Capital Corporation=s Motion To Dismiss.@  It is the court=s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL D:   LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ.

 

DELIVERED:  January 26, 2006



[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.