Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2006

Pete Christiansen v. Bobby W. Wilkerson

Pete Christiansen v. Bobby W. Wilkerson
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided January 12, 2006

Pete Christiansen v. Bobby W. Wilkerson

Opinion

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                      COURT OF APPEALS

                                       SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                                   FORT WORTH

 

                                        NO. 2-05-246-CV

PETE CHRISTIANSEN                                                           APPELLANT

 

                                                   V.

 

BOBBY W. WILKERSON                                                           APPELLEE

 

                                               ----------

                   FROM THE COUNTY COURT OF COOKE COUNTY

                                               ----------

                  MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT

                                               ----------

On November 30, 2005, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as required by rule 38.6(a).   See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a).  We stated we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1).  We have not received any response.

Because appellant=s brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).


Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

   

PER CURIAM                      

PANEL D:  DAUPHINOT, HOLMAN, and GARDNER, JJ.

 

DELIVERED: January 12, 2006

 

 



[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.