Pete Christiansen v. Bobby W. Wilkerson
Pete Christiansen v. Bobby W. Wilkerson
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 2-05-246-CV
PETE CHRISTIANSEN APPELLANT
V.
BOBBY W. WILKERSON APPELLEE
----------
FROM THE COUNTY COURT OF COOKE COUNTY
----------
MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT
----------
On November 30, 2005, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as required by rule 38.6(a). See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). We stated we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1). We have not received any response.
Because appellant=s brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).
Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.
PER CURIAM
PANEL D: DAUPHINOT, HOLMAN, and GARDNER, JJ.
DELIVERED: January 12, 2006
[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.