Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2006

Pete Christiansen v. Bobby W. Wilkerson

Pete Christiansen v. Bobby W. Wilkerson
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided January 12, 2006

Pete Christiansen v. Bobby W. Wilkerson

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-05-246-CV

PETE CHRISTIANSEN APPELLANT

V.

BOBBY W. WILKERSON APPELLEE

----------

FROM THE COUNTY COURT OF COOKE COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION (footnote: 1) AND JUDGMENT

----------

On November 30, 2005, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as required by rule 38.6(a).   See T EX . R. A PP . P. 38.6(a).  We stated we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.   See T EX . R. A PP . P. 38.8(a)(1).  We have not received any response.

Because appellant’s brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.   See T EX . R. A PP . P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

   

PER CURIAM

PANEL D:  DAUPHINOT, HOLMAN, and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED: January 12, 2006

FOOTNOTES

1:

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.