Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2006

La'Afrique James Hollie v. State

La'Afrique James Hollie v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided March 2, 2006

La'Afrique James Hollie v. State

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN





NO. 03-06-00088-CR






La’Afrique James Hollie, Appellant



v.



The State of Texas, Appellee







FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 264TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 49829, HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESIDING





M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

 

La’Afrique James Hollie seeks to appeal from a judgment of conviction for aggravated robbery rendered after the court revoked his deferred adjudication community supervision and adjudged him guilty. The trial court has certified that Hollie waived his right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2); Monreal v. State, 99 S.W.3d 615, 622 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003); see also Blanco v. State, 18 S.W.3d 218, 220 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000).

The court has also certified that this is a plea-bargain case. Rule 25.2(a)(2) does not apply, however, to bargained pleas of true at an adjudication hearing. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 613 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). See also Hargesheimer v. State, No. PD-1610-04, 2006 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 17, at *17-19 (Tex. Crim. App. Jan. 18, 2006).


Based on the certification that Hollie waived his right of appeal, the appeal is dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).

 

 

                                                __________________________________________

                                                W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Patterson and Pemberton

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: March 2, 2006

Do Not Publish

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.