La'Afrique James Hollie v. State
La'Afrique James Hollie v. State
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-06-00088-CR
La’Afrique James Hollie, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 264TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. 49829, HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESIDING
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
La’Afrique James Hollie seeks to appeal from a judgment of conviction for aggravated robbery rendered after the court revoked his deferred adjudication community supervision and adjudged him guilty. The trial court has certified that Hollie waived his right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2); Monreal v. State, 99 S.W.3d 615, 622 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003); see also Blanco v. State, 18 S.W.3d 218, 220 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000).
The court has also certified that this is a plea-bargain case. Rule 25.2(a)(2) does not apply, however, to bargained pleas of true at an adjudication hearing. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 613 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). See also Hargesheimer v. State, No. PD-1610-04, 2006 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 17, at *17-19 (Tex. Crim. App. Jan. 18, 2006).
Based on the certification that Hollie waived his right of appeal, the appeal is dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).
__________________________________________
W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Patterson and Pemberton
Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
Filed: March 2, 2006
Do Not Publish
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.