Josephine Douglas-Peters v. James Nathaniel Peters
Josephine Douglas-Peters v. James Nathaniel Peters
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-05-00065-CV
Josephine Douglas-Peters, Appellant
v.
James Nathaniel Peters, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 395TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. 01-1528-F395, HONORABLE MICHAEL JERGINS, JUDGE PRESIDING
D I S S E N T I N G O P I N I O N
While I agree with the majority’s disposition of Douglas’s other issues and Peters’s request for damages under Rule 45, I disagree with its disposition of Douglas’s second issue and, accordingly, respectfully dissent from the majority’s judgment of reversal. Given the absence of a reporter’s record, the state of the clerk’s record, and the presumptions that operate in support of the district court’s judgment in such circumstances, I would affirm.
__________________________________________
Bob Pemberton, Justice
Before Chief Justice Law, Justices B. A. Smith and Pemberton
Filed: March 2, 2006
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.