Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2006

Josephine Douglas-Peters v. James Nathaniel Peters

Josephine Douglas-Peters v. James Nathaniel Peters
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided March 2, 2006

Josephine Douglas-Peters v. James Nathaniel Peters

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN




NO. 03-05-00065-CV





Josephine Douglas-Peters, Appellant


v.


James Nathaniel Peters, Appellee






FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 395TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 01-1528-F395, HONORABLE MICHAEL JERGINS, JUDGE PRESIDING





D I S S E N T I N G O P I N I O N



                        While I agree with the majority’s disposition of Douglas’s other issues and Peters’s request for damages under Rule 45, I disagree with its disposition of Douglas’s second issue and, accordingly, respectfully dissent from the majority’s judgment of reversal. Given the absence of a reporter’s record, the state of the clerk’s record, and the presumptions that operate in support of the district court’s judgment in such circumstances, I would affirm.

 

 

                                                                        __________________________________________

                                                                        Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices B. A. Smith and Pemberton

Filed: March 2, 2006

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.