Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2006

Trina Gosnell v. State

Trina Gosnell v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided January 12, 2006

Trina Gosnell v. State

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN





NO. 03-05-00325-CR

NO. 03-05-00326-CR





Trina Gosnell, Appellant


&


John Charles Gosnell II, Appellant


v.


The State of Texas, Appellee






FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY, 22ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NOS. CR-03-264 & CR-03-265, HONORABLE GARY L. STEEL, JUDGE PRESIDING





O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Following a hearing ordered by this Court pursuant to rule 38.8(b), the district court found that appellants desire to prosecute these appeals and are not indigent. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b). The court also found that appellants’ retained counsel, Mr. W. Paul Parash, has not abandoned the appeals despite his failure to file a brief, which was due October 12, 2005. It is apparent from counsel’s statements that his failure to file a brief is due to the fact that he has not been paid. Counsel informed the court that he anticipates payment of his fees by January 16, 2006.

Appellants have failed to make the necessary arrangements for filing a brief. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(4). If counsel does not tender a brief for filing on or before February 10, the appeal will be submitted for decision without briefs on February 13, 2006.

It is ordered January 12, 2006.

 

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Pemberton and Waldrop

Do Not Publish

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.