Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2006

Jesse Edmon Washington v. State

Jesse Edmon Washington v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided January 6, 2006

Jesse Edmon Washington v. State

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN






NO. 03-05-00632-CR





Jesse Edmon Washington, Appellant


v.


The State of Texas, Appellee






FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 403RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 2030206, HONORABLE BRENDA KENNEDY, JUDGE PRESIDING





M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

 

Appellant’s brief was due November 28, 2005. Appellant’s retained attorney, Mr. J. W. Howeth, did not respond to this Court’s notice that the brief is overdue.

The appeal is abated. The district court is ordered to conduct a hearing to determine whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal, whether appellant is indigent, and, if he is not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2). The court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations. If appellant desires to prosecute this appeal but is indigent, the court shall appoint substitute counsel who will effectively represent appellant on appeal. A record from this hearing, including copies of all findings and orders and a transcription of the court reporter’s notes, shall be forwarded to the Clerk of this Court for filing as a supplemental record no later than February 3, 2006. Rule 38.8(b)(3).

 

 

                                                __________________________________________

                                                David Puryear, Justice

Before Justices B. A. Smith, Patterson and Puryear

Filed: January 6, 2006

Do Not Publish

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.