Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2006

Elizabeth Graham Brook v. State

Elizabeth Graham Brook v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided July 19, 2006

Elizabeth Graham Brook v. State

Opinion










In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana


______________________________


No. 06-06-00013-CR

______________________________



ELIZABETH GRAHAM BROOK, Appellant

 

V.

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee



                                              


On Appeal from the 124th Judicial District Court

Gregg County, Texas

Trial Court No. 32,923-B



                                                 




Before Morriss, C.J., Ross and Carter, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter



MEMORANDUM OPINION


            Elizabeth Graham Brook, appellant, has filed with this Court a motion to dismiss her appeal. The motion is signed by Brook in compliance with Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). As authorized by Rule 42.2, we grant the motion. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2.

            Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

 


 

                                                                        Jack Carter

                                                                        Justice

 

Date Submitted:          July 18, 2006

Date Decided:             July 19, 2006


Do Not Publish


Priority="69" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3"/>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In The

  Court of Appeals

                        Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

 

                                                ______________________________

 

                                                             No. 06-11-00098-CR

                                                ______________________________

 

 

 

                                                                        IN RE:

LOUIS R. JONES

 

 

                                                                                                  

 

                                                                                                                            

                                                     Original Mandamus Proceeding

 

                                                                                                  

 

 

 

 

                                          Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

                                        Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss

                                                                             

                                                                             


                                                      MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

            Louis R. Jones has petitioned this Court for mandamus relief, naming as respondent the 202nd Judicial District Court of Bowie County, Texas.  Jones asks this Court to order the trial court to rule on his motion for judgment nunc pro tunc, in order to credit Jones with time served for which no credit was given.

            Jones was convicted in trial court cause number 07F0284-202 in the 202nd Judicial District Court of Bowie County, Texas.  According to his petition, Jones was sentenced to twenty-five years’ imprisonment in that case.  Jones alleges that, pursuant to a plea agreement, he was to receive 990 days’ jail time credit for time served in the Arkansas Department of Corrections while also being held on a fugitive warrant from Bowie County, Texas, for the charge on which he was ultimately convicted in Bowie County.

            Respondent has entered a nunc pro tunc judgment in cause number 07F0284-202, giving Jones the credit he seeks.  Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus as moot.

 

           

                                                                                    Josh R. Morriss, III

                                                                                    Chief Justice

 

Date Submitted:          May 25, 2011

Date Decided:             May 26, 2011

 

Do Not Publish          

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.