Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2006

David Meriweather Anderson v. Jack A. Sunseri and Consolidated Partners, Ltd.

David Meriweather Anderson v. Jack A. Sunseri and Consolidated Partners, Ltd.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided October 11, 2006

David Meriweather Anderson v. Jack A. Sunseri and Consolidated Partners, Ltd.

Opinion

NO. 07-06-0149-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

OCTOBER 11, 2006

______________________________

DAVID MERIWEATHER ANDERSON, APPELLANT

V.

JACK A. SUNSERI AND CONSOLIDATED PARTNERS, LTD., APPELLEES

_________________________________

FROM THE 261 ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY;

NO. GN 503,111; HONORABLE MARGARET A. COOPER, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, David Meriweather Anderson, filed a notice of appeal from a Judgment entered February 15, 2006.  The clerk’s record was filed on May 30, 2006 and there is not a reporter’s record per the docketing statement filed by appellant.   By letter dated September 11, 2006,  the clerk of this court notified appellant that his brief was due September 1, 2006, but had yet to be filed.   See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a).  The letter further advised appellant that the appeal would be subject to dismissal for want of prosecution if the brief, or a response reasonably explaining the failure to file a brief with a showing that appellee had not been injured by the delay, was not filed by September 21, 2006.  No brief, motion for extension or other response has been received.

Accordingly, we now dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution and failure to comply with a directive of the court.   See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1) and 42.3(b), (c).    

Mackey K. Hancock

       Justice

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.