Charles A. Beery v. State
Charles A. Beery v. State
Opinion
NO. 07-06-0005-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL D
MARCH 2, 2006
______________________________
CHARLES ALLEN BEERY, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
_________________________________
FROM THE 320 TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;
NO. 50,160-D; HONORABLE DON EMERSON, JUDGE
_______________________________
Before QUINN, C.J. and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Charles A. Beery, seeks to appeal his conviction of aggravated sexual assault of a child and accompanying sentence of 99 years confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
In a criminal case, appeal is perfected by timely filing a sufficient notice of appeal. T EX . R. A PP . P. 25.2(b); 26.2. A timely filed notice of appeal is essential to invoke our appellate jurisdiction. Slaton v. State , 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex.Crim.App. 1998); Olivo v. State , 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996).
The record before us reflects appellant was sentenced on September 7, 2005. The notice of appeal was due on or before October 7, 2005. T EX . R. A PP . P. 26.2(a). Appellant did not file his notice of appeal until January 19, 2006. Appellant’s failure to file a timely notice of appeal prevents this court from having jurisdiction over his appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. (footnote: 1) T EX . R. A PP . P. 39.8, 40.2, 43.2(f).
James T. Campbell
Justice
Do not publish.
FOOTNOTES
1:
Appellant may be entitled to an out-of-time appeal by filing a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus returnable to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See T EX . C ODE C RIM . P ROC . A NN . art. 11.07 (Vernon 2005); see also Ex parte Garcia, 988 S.W.2d 240 (Tex.Crim.App. 1999).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.