Brent Lee Crockett v. State
Brent Lee Crockett v. State
Opinion
NO. 07-04-0438-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL A JANUARY 31, 2006 ______________________________ BRENT LEE CROCKETT, APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE _________________________________ FROM THE 84TH DISTRICT COURT OF HUTCHINSON COUNTY; NO. 8792; HONORABLE WILLIAM D. SMITH, JUDGE _______________________________
Before REAVIS and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Pending before this Court is appellant’s pro se motion to dismiss his appeal. It is signed by appellant. Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). No decision of the Court having been delivered to date, we grant the motion. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
Also pending is the motion to withdraw filed by Donald F. Schofield, appellant’s appointed counsel, which motion accompanied counsel’s Anders1 brief. The appeal having been dismissed, we dismiss counsel’s motion to withdraw as moot.
James T. Campbell Justice
Do not publish.
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.