Vince Arthur Hall v. State
Vince Arthur Hall v. State
Opinion
NO. 07-05-0362-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL D
JANUARY 10, 2006
______________________________
VINCE ARTHUR HALL,
Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
Appellee
_________________________________
FROM THE 320 th DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;
NO. 49,685-D; HON. DON EMERSON, PRESIDING
_______________________________
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
_______________________________
Before QUINN, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.
Appellant, Vince Arthur Hall, appeals from an order revoking his community supervision. The record does not contain a certification of his right to appeal as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d). Through letter dated November 30, 2005, this court notified the trial court, the district clerk, the district attorney and appellant’s attorney of this omission and the need for the certification. To date, the certification has yet to be filed. Consequently, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d) (requiring that the appeal be dismissed if a certification that shows that the defendant has a right to appeal has not been made part of the record).
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed, and the pending motion for leave to extend the appellant’s briefing deadline is denied as moot.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.