Edward C. Holland v. State
Edward C. Holland v. State
Opinion
On September 28, 2006, we informed the parties that our jurisdiction was not apparent from the notice of appeal, and notified them that the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless we received a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. Appellant's response does not establish our jurisdiction.
The notices of appeal seek to appeal the "State's failure to dismiss causes and denial of speedy trial," but according to the trial court clerk the appellant has not been convicted or sentenced in cause nos. 89821, 91160, 91297, 92581, 92582, and 92583. The issue raised by appellant is not appealable at this time. See Smith v. Gohmert, 962 S.W.2d 590, 592-93 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
APPEAL DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.
____________________________
CHARLES KREGER
Justice
Opinion Delivered November 22, 2006
Do Not Publish
Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Kreger, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.