Jonathan Hurst v. James Hurst
Jonathan Hurst v. James Hurst
Opinion
On August 3, 2006, we notified the parties that the notice of appeal did not identify a judgment or other appealable order, and that it appeared no judgment or appealable order has been signed in the case. No response has been filed.
The notice of appeal seeks to appeal an order continuing the case. The trial court has not signed its final judgment on the case. No appealable order has been signed by the trial court. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
____________________________
HOLLIS HORTON
Justice
Opinion Delivered September 14, 2006
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.