Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2006

in the Matter of M.D.L.

in the Matter of M.D.L.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided July 27, 2006

in the Matter of M.D.L.

Opinion

In The



Court of Appeals



Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________



NO. 09-06-001 CV

____________________



IN THE MATTER OF M.D.L.


On Appeal from the 279th District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. F-9910-J




MEMORANDUM OPINION

After M.D.L. signed a stipulation of evidence, the trial court found M.D.L. committed burglary of a habitation on two occasions and intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly carried a handgun. The trial court also found that M.D.L. has not responded to parental attempts to provide supervision and could pose a danger to himself or the public because of his use of a weapon. Therefore, the trial court found M.D.L. to be in need of rehabilitation and committed him to the Texas Youth Commission for an indeterminate time not to exceed his twenty-first birthday.

After perfecting M.D.L.'s appeal, counsel filed a brief asserting that the appeal is frivolous. The brief complies with the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and In re D.A.S., 973 S.W.2d 296 (Tex. 1998). No pro se brief has been filed.

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel's brief, and we find no arguable error requiring us to order appointment of new counsel. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's judgment. (1)

AFFIRMED.

STEVE McKEITHEN

Chief Justice







Submitted on July 4, 2006

Opinion Delivered July 27, 2006



Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Horton, JJ.

1.The State contends this Court lacks jurisdiction because M.D.L. signed a stipulation of evidence. See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 56.01(n) (Vernon 2002). However, at the commitment hearing, the trial court impliedly gave M.D.L. the right to appeal. See id.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.