The trial court found M.O.H. committed the felony offense of burglary of a habitation on two occasions, found a history of running away made M.O.H. likely to abscond, found M.O.H. has not responded to parental attempts to provide supervision, found M.O.H. is currently on probation for burglary of a habitation and burglary of a building, found M.O.H. to be a delinquent juvenile in need of rehabilitation, and committed M.O.H. to the Texas Youth Commission for an indeterminate time not to exceed his twenty-first birthday. The record reflects M.O.H. committed the offenses the first and second days after being placed on probation for burglary.

After perfecting appeal, appointed counsel filed a brief asserting that the appeal is frivolous. The brief complies with the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and In re D.A.S., 973 S.W.2d 296 (Tex. 1998). On February 9, 2006, we granted M.O.H. and his mother an extension of time in which to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel's brief, and we find no arguable error requiring us to order appointment of new counsel. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's judgment.

AFFIRMED.

____________________________

DAVID GAULTNEY

Justice

Submitted on May 22, 2006

Opinion Delivered June 1, 2006

Before Gaultney, Kreger, and Horton, JJ.