Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2006

Kelli Martinez Dunn v. State

Kelli Martinez Dunn v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided May 31, 2006

Kelli Martinez Dunn v. State

Opinion

In The



Court of Appeals



Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________



NO. 09-05-216 CR

____________________



KELLI MARTINEZ DUNN, Appellant



V.



THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee




On Appeal from the Criminal District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 94345




MEMORANDUM OPINION

Kelli Martinez Dunn entered a non-negotiated guilty plea to an indictment for the first degree felony offense of aggravated robbery. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 29.03(a)(2) (Vernon 2003). The trial court convicted and sentenced Dunn to six years of confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division. The trial court certified that this is not a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has the right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).

Appellate counsel filed a brief that concludes no arguable error is presented in this appeal. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); High

v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). On February 9, 2006, Dunn was given an extension of time in which to file a pro se brief. We received no response from the appellant. As there was no plea bargain agreement, we have jurisdiction over the appeal. Jack v. State, 871 S.W.2d 741 (Tex. Crim. App. 1994). The required admonishments appear in the record. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 26.13 (Vernon Supp. 2005). Dunn signed a judicial confession. She does not contest the voluntariness of her guilty plea.

We have reviewed the clerk's and the reporter's records, and find no arguable error requiring us to order appointment of new counsel. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). The trial court's judgment is affirmed. (1)

AFFIRMED.

____________________________

HOLLIS HORTON

Justice



Submitted on May 22, 2006

Opinion Delivered May 31, 2006

Do Not Publish



Before Gaultney, Kreger and Horton, JJ.

1.Appellant may challenge our decision in the case by filing a petition for discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.