Pharoh Eric Jerome Breed v. Rusk State Hospital
Pharoh Eric Jerome Breed v. Rusk State Hospital
Opinion
On January 26, 2006, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution unless arrangements were made for filing the record or the appellant explained why he needed time for filing the record. Appellant did not respond. The appellant is not entitled to proceed without payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 20.1. There being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to file the record, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Costs are assessed against appellant.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
____________________________
CHARLES KREGER
Justice
Opinion Delivered March 23, 2006
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger, and Horton, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.