Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2006

Theresa Haynes in Trust for Dominique Haynes v. Montgomery County, Constable Chumley, Walden C.I.A. and Susan Escobar and Arnold Escobar

Theresa Haynes in Trust for Dominique Haynes v. Montgomery County, Constable Chumley, Walden C.I.A. and Susan Escobar and Arnold Escobar
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided February 9, 2006

Theresa Haynes in Trust for Dominique Haynes v. Montgomery County, Constable Chumley, Walden C.I.A. and Susan Escobar and Arnold Escobar

Opinion

In The



Court of Appeals



Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont



____________________



NO. 09-05-509 CV

____________________



THERESA HAYNES, IN TRUST FOR DOMINIQUE HAYNES, Appellant



V.



MONTGOMERY COUNTY, CONSTABLE CHUMLEY, WALDEN C.I.A.,

AND SUSAN ESCOBAR AND ARNOLD ESCOBAR, Appellees




On Appeal from the 284th District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 04-02-01229 CV




MEMORANDUM OPINION

On January 5, 2006, we notified the parties that the notice of appeal did not identify a judgment or other appealable order, and that it appeared no judgment or appealable order has been signed in the case. Appellees Susan Escobar and Arnold Escobar filed a response.

The notice of appeal seeks to appeal an "Order Granting Defendant's Motion to Compel Responses to Request for Disclosure and Request for Production." The trial court has not signed its final judgment on the case. No appealable order has been signed by the trial court. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

APPEAL DISMISSED.



___________________________

STEVE McKEITHEN

Chief Justice







Opinion Delivered February 9, 2006

Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Kreger, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.