in Re: Ezra Donnell
in Re: Ezra Donnell
Opinion
NO. 12-06-00092-CV
NO. 12-06-00093-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
TYLER, TEXAS
§
IN RE: EZRA DONNELL, § ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
RELATOR
§
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Ezra Donnell seeks a writ of mandamus requiring the Honorable David V. Wilson, Judge of the 217th Judicial District Court, Angelina County, Texas, to either loan him the record from his criminal trial or, alternatively, conduct a hearing on his motion for loan of the record. Donnell is requesting the record for preparation of an application for postconviction writ of habeas corpus in two felony cases.
Courts of appeals have no jurisdiction over postconviction writs of habeas corpus in felony cases. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. § 11.07, § 3 (Vernon 2005); Board of Pardons and Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995) (jurisdiction to grant postconviction habeas relief lies exclusively with court of criminal appeals). Because Donnell requests the record for purposes of pursuing postconviction relief in two felony cases, we conclude that we have no jurisdiction to consider the merits of his petition. See In re Trevino, 79 S.W.3d 794, 795 (Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 2002, orig. proceeding); but cf. In re Bunch, No. 07-03-00103-CV, 2003 WL 21140912, at * 1 (Tex. App.–Amarillo May 16, 2003, orig. proceeding) (not designated for publication) (holding that appellate court had no jurisdiction to require district court to provide copy or loan record, but could direct court to conduct hearing on relator’s motion for record). Therefore, Donnell’s petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
JAMES T. WORTHEN
Chief Justice
Opinion delivered March 31, 2006.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and DeVasto, J.
(PUBLISH)
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.