Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2006

in Re: Evangelina & Gilberto Renteria

in Re: Evangelina & Gilberto Renteria
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided July 26, 2006

in Re: Evangelina & Gilberto Renteria

Opinion

 

                                                                                        

 

 

 

                                                                                        

 

                              NUMBER 13-06-392-CV

 

                         COURT OF APPEALS

 

                     THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

                         CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG 

                                                                                                                     

 

IN RE: EVANGELINA AND GILBERTO RENTERIA

                                                                                                      

 

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus and

Motion for Emergency Temporary Relief

                                                                                                                      

 

                               MEMORANDUM OPINION                                   

 

                      Before Justices Rodriguez, Castillo, and Garza

                                 Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

 

On July 11, 2006, relators, Evangelina and Gilberto Renteria, filed a petition for writ of mandamus with this Court in which they allege that on June 23, 2006, respondent, the Honorable Mario Ramirez, Presiding Judge of the 332nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, abused his discretion by entering an order compelling the relators to produce their medical expert for an unfettered deposition. 


Relators= petition for writ of mandamus asks this Court to order the respondent to vacate the order dated June 23, 2006.  In addition, relators filed a motion for emergency relief, asking this Court to order a stay of the deposition of the medical expert scheduled for August 3, 2006.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the relators= motion for emergency relief, the petition for writ of mandamus, and the real party in interest=s response, is of the opinion that relators have not shown themselves entitled to the relief sought and the motion for emergency relief and petition for writ of mandamus should be denied.  See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8.  Accordingly, the motion for emergency relief and petition for writ of mandamus are hereby DENIED.

 

                                                                                                                                   

PER CURIAM

 

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 26th day of July, 2006.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.