Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2006

in Re: Eugene X. Mercier

in Re: Eugene X. Mercier
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided July 11, 2006

in Re: Eugene X. Mercier

Opinion

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                             NUMBER 13-06-389-CV

 

                         COURT OF APPEALS

 

               THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

                  CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________

 

                          IN RE: EUGENE X. MERCIER  

__________________________________________________________________

 

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Motion for Emergency Hearing

                      on Petition for Writ of Mandamus ___________________________________________________________________

 

                     MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

         Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

                            Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion[1]

 

Relator, Eugene X. Mercier, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on July 10, 2006.  The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus, its record and its "clerk's record," is of the opinion that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief sought.  Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus is denied.  See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).


Furthermore, relator's motion for emergency hearing on petition for writ of mandamus filed on July 10, 2006, is also denied.

 

PER CURIAM

 

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this 11th day of July, 2006.



[1] See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) (AWhen denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so.@); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.