Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2006

in Re: Max York and Tina York

in Re: Max York and Tina York
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided June 21, 2006

in Re: Max York and Tina York

Opinion

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                             NUMBER 13-06-291-CV

 

                         COURT OF APPEALS

 

               THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

                  CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

_____________________________________________________________

 

                     IN RE: MAX YORK AND TINA YORK                                              

_____________________________________________________________

 

                      On Petition for Writ of Mandamus _____________________________________________________________

 

                     MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

         Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

                            Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion[1]

 

Relators, Max York and Tina York, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on June 2, 2006.  The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus and the responses filed by real parties in interest, is of the opinion that relators have not shown themselves entitled to the relief sought.  Accordingly, relators' petition for writ of mandamus is denied.  See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).


Furthermore, on June 2, 2006, this Court granted relators' motion to stay all trial court proceedings in cause number C-2009-05-E in Hidalgo County, pending our review of the petition for writ of mandamus.  Having denied the petition, the stay is hereby lifted.

PER CURIAM

 

 

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this 21st day of June, 2006.

 



[1] See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) (AWhen denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so.@); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.