Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2006

Rey Esquivel D/B/A Esquivel Bail Bonds v. State

Rey Esquivel D/B/A Esquivel Bail Bonds v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided June 8, 2006

Rey Esquivel D/B/A Esquivel Bail Bonds v. State

Opinion

 

 

 

 

 

 

                             NUMBER 13-06-206-CV

 

                         COURT OF APPEALS

 

               THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

                  CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

_________________________________________________________

 

REY ESQUIVEL D/B/A ESQUIVEL BAIL BONDS,              Appellant,

 

                                           v.

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                              Appellee.

_________________________________________________________

 

                On appeal from County Court at Law No. 2

                           of Cameron County, Texas

_________________________________________________________

 

                     MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

              Before Justices Rodriguez, Castillo, and Garza

                       Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

 


Appellant, REY ESQUIVEL D/B/A ESQUIVEL BAIL BONDS, attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the County Court at Law No. 2 of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 2004-CCL-1430-B.  Judgment in this cause was signed on April 27, 2005.  A timely motion for new trial was filed on May 20, 2005.  Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, appellant=s notice of appeal was due on July 26, 2005, but was not filed until March 27, 2006. 

Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done.  Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court=s letter, the appeal would be dismissed.  To date, no response has been received from appellant.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant=s failure to timely perfect his appeal, and appellant=s failure to respond to this Court=s notice, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.  The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

 

 

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 8th day of June, 2006.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.