Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2006

Anthony R. Bearden v. H. B. Fuller Company

Anthony R. Bearden v. H. B. Fuller Company
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided May 25, 2006

Anthony R. Bearden v. H. B. Fuller Company

Opinion

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                            NUMBER 13-05-503-CV

 

                                      COURT OF APPEALS

 

                            THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

                              CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

_______________________________________________________

 

ANTHONY R. BEARDEN, ET AL.,                                                           Appellants,

 

                                                             v.

 

H. B. FULLER COMPANY, ET AL.,                                                           Appellees.

_______________________________________________________

 

                               On appeal from the 319th District Court

                                           of Nueces County, Texas.

_______________________________________________________

 

                                 MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

                                     Before Justices Rodriguez, Castillo, and Garza

                                                Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

 

Appellants, ANTHONY R. BEARDEN, ET AL., attempted to perfect an appeal from an order entered by the 319th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause no. 02-05231-G.  The clerk=s record was received on February 27, 2006. 


Upon review of the clerk=s record, it appeared that the order from which this appeal was taken was not a final appealable order.  Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.3, notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done.  Appellants were advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.  Appellants failed to file a response as requested by this Court=s notice.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants= failure to respond to this Court=s notice, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

 

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 25th day of May, 2006.

 

 

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.