Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2006

in Re: State of Texas

in Re: State of Texas
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided April 3, 2006

in Re: State of Texas

Opinion

 

                                                                                        

 

 

                                                                                        

 

 

                              NUMBER 13-06-144-CV

 

                         COURT OF APPEALS

 

                     THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

                         CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG 

                                                                                                                     

 

IN RE: THE STATE OF TEXAS

                                                                                                                      

 

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

                                                                                                                      

 

                               MEMORANDUM OPINION                                   

 

                         Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Garza

                                 Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

 

On March 28, 2006, relator, The State of Texas, filed a petition for writ of mandamus with this Court.  Relator=s petition for writ of mandamus asks this Court to order the Respondent, the Honorable Juan R. Partida, Presiding Judge of the 275th District Court of Hidalgo County, to vacate his order dated February 1, 2005, and  to enter an order that compels the real party in interest, Burns Motors, Inc., to produce the purchase order and salesman=s worksheet for the 1,395 sales transactions occurring between July 1, 2000 and June 30, 2001.


            The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus, is of the opinion that relator has not shown itself entitled to the relief sought and the petition for writ of mandamus should be denied.  See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8.  Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.

 

PER CURIAM

 

 

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 3rd day of April, 2006.

 

 

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.