in Re: William N. Woolsey, Individually and Woolsey & Schmidt, L.L.P.
in Re: William N. Woolsey, Individually and Woolsey & Schmidt, L.L.P.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-05-724-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
_________________________________________________________________
IN RE: WILLIAM N. WOOLSEY, INDIVIDUALLY, AND
WOOLSEY & SCHMIDT, L.L.P.
__________________________________________________________________
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus __________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza
Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion[1]
Relators, William N. Woolsey, Individually, and Woolsey & Schmidt, L.L.P., filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on November 16, 2005. Real Party in Interest, Jack L. Stone, filed a response on December 13, 2005. The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus and the response, is of the opinion that relators have not shown themselves entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, relators' petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and
filed this 21st day of March, 2006.
[1] See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) (AWhen denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so.@); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.