Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2006

Christopher M. Weaver v. Ingrid E. Weaver

Christopher M. Weaver v. Ingrid E. Weaver
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided March 9, 2006

Christopher M. Weaver v. Ingrid E. Weaver

Opinion

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                            

 

NUMBER 13-05-745-CV

 

                         COURT OF APPEALS

 

               THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

                  CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

_______________________________________________________

 

CHRISTOPHER M. WEAVER,                                      Appellant,

 

                                           v.

 

INGRID E. WEAVER,                                                  Appellee.

_______________________________________________________

 

                  On appeal from the 370th District Court

                           of Hidalgo County, Texas.

_______________________________________________________

 

                     MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

                Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Garza

                       Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

 


Appellant, CHRISTOPHER M. WEAVER, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the   370th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number F-3547-02-G.  The clerk=s record was received on December 2, 2005.  No reporter=s record was filed.  Appellant=s brief was due on January 3, 2006.  To date, no appellate brief has been received.

When the appellant has failed to file a brief in the time prescribed, the Court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, unless the appellant reasonably explains the failure and the appellee is not significantly injured by the appellant=s failure to timely file a brief.  Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).

On January 13, 2006, notice was given to all parties that this appeal was subject to dismissal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).  Appellant was given ten days to explain why the cause should not be dismissed for failure to file a brief.  To date, no response has been received.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant=s failure to file a proper appellate brief, this Court=s notice, and appellant=s failure to respond, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution.  The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.

PER CURIAM

 

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 9th day of March, 2006

 

 

 

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.