Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2006

Christopher Crockett v. State

Christopher Crockett v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided March 9, 2006

Christopher Crockett v. State

Opinion

 

 

 

 

 

 

                             NUMBER 13-05-776-CR

 

                         COURT OF APPEALS

 

               THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

                  CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

__________________________________________________________________

 

CHRISTOPHER CROCKETT,                                       Appellant,

 

                                           v.

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                              Appellee.

__________________________________________________________________

 

                  On appeal from the 130th District Court

                         of Matagorda County, Texas.

___________________________________________________________________

 

                     MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

                 Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Garza

                       Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

 


Appellant, CHRISTOPHER CROCKETT, attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the 130th District Court of Matagorda County, Texas.  Sentence in this cause was imposed on July 20, 2005.  A timely motion for new trial was filed on August 9, 2005.   The notice of appeal was due to be filed on October 18, 2005, but was not filed until December 19, 2005.   Said notice of appeal is untimely filed.

          Tex. R. App. P. 26.3 provides that the court of appeals may grant an extension of time for filing notice of appeal if such notice is filed within  fifteen days of the last day allowed and within the same period a motion is filed in the court of appeals reasonably explaining the need for such extension.  Appellant failed to file his notice of appeal and a motion requesting an extension of time within such period.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's failure to timely perfect his appeal, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.  The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 9th day of March, 2006.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.