Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2006

Maximo R. Aleman v. Ge Life and Annuity Assurance Co.

Maximo R. Aleman v. Ge Life and Annuity Assurance Co.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided February 16, 2006

Maximo R. Aleman v. Ge Life and Annuity Assurance Co.

Opinion

 

 

 

 

 

 

                             NUMBER 13-05-758-CV

 

                         COURT OF APPEALS

 

               THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

                  CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________

 

MAXIMO R. ALEMAN, ET AL.,                                  Appellants,

 

                                           v.

 

GE LIFE AND ANNUITY ASSURANCE CO., ET AL.,         Appellees.

___________________________________________________________________

 

                  On appeal from the 319th District Court

                            of Nueces County, Texas

___________________________________________________________________

 

                     MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

                Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Garza

                       Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

 


Appellants, MAXIMO R. ALEMAN, ET AL., attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the 319th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 04-117-G.  Judgment in this cause was signed on December 22, 2003.  No timely motion for new trial was filed.  Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, appellants= notice of appeal was due on January 21, 2004, but was not filed until March 24, 2004.   Appellees have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal.

Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done.  Appellants were advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court=s letter, the appeal would be dismissed.  To date, no response has been received from appellants.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellants= failure to timely perfect their appeal, appellants= failure to respond to this Court=s notice, and appellees= motion to dismiss the appeal,  is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.  Appellees= motion to dismiss the appeal is GRANTED, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this the 16th day of February, 2006.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.