Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2007

In Re Schmitz

In Re Schmitz
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided July 11, 2007 · Sitting: Catherine Stone
285 S.W.3d 491; 2007 WL 1987721 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

In Re Schmitz

Opinion

285 S.W.3d 491 (2007)

In re Harold R. SCHMITZ, Norborne P. Cole, Jr., Brian C. Flynn, Jr., et al.

No. 04-07-00359-CV.

Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio.

July 11, 2007.

Debra J. McComas, George W. Bramblett, Jr., Nicholas Even, Haynes and Boone, L.L.P., Dallas, TX, Lamont A. Jefferson, Haynes and Boone, L.L.P., San Antonio, TX, for Appellant.

Joe Kendall, Willie C. Briscoe, Hamilton Lindley, Provost Umphrey Law Firm, L.L.P., Dallas, TX, Darren J. Robbins, Randall Baron, Amber L. Eck, David T. Wissbroecker, Kevin K. Green, Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins, San Diego, CA, Robert B. Weiser, The Weiser Law Firm, P.C., Wayne, PA, for Appellee.

Sitting: CATHERINE STONE, Justice, PHYLIS J. SPEEDLIN, Justice, STEVEN C. HILBIG, Justice.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM.

The court has considered relators' petition for a writ of mandamus and the response of the real party in interest and is of the opinion that relief should be denied. See TEX.R.APP. P. 52.8(a). Accordingly, relators' petition for a writ of mandamus is denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.