William E. Trump v. Vaughn Arthur Motsko
William E. Trump v. Vaughn Arthur Motsko
Opinion
Opinion issued August 30, 2007
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
NO. 01-07-00486-CV
WILLIAM E. TRUMP, Appellant
V.
VAUGHN ARTHUR MOTSKO, Appellee
On Appeal from Probate Court No. 3
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 371,418-401
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is an attempted interlocutory appeal from the probate court's order denying appellant William E. Trump's motion to abate proceedings and quash his deposition. Trump alleges that conducting the deposition violates the Federal Arbitration Act. See 9 U.S.C. §§ 1-16 (2000). Trump also filed a petition for a writ of mandamus in this Court, which was denied. In re Trump, No. 01-07-00485-CV (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] June 18, 2007, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.).
There is no statute authorizing an interlocutory appeal from an order granting or denying a request to compel arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act. Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps, 842 S.W.2d 266, 272 (Tex. 1992). The probate court's order is also not a final, appealable order. See Tex. Prob. Code Ann. § 5(g) (Vernon Supp. 2006).
We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. The Clerk of this Court is directed to issue the mandate immediately. See Tex. R. App. P. 18.6.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Nuchia, Hanks, and Bland.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.