Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2007

Peter Gilbert Contreras v. State

Peter Gilbert Contreras v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided August 30, 2007

Peter Gilbert Contreras v. State

Opinion













In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

____________



NO. 01-06-00832-CR

____________



PETER GILBERT CONTRERAS, Appellant



V.



THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee




On Appeal from the 182nd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1069049




MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Peter Gilbert Contreras, pleaded guilty to the felony offense of indecency with a child, and, in accordance with his plea bargain agreement with the State, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for six years. Appellant filed a timely pro se notice of appeal

In a plea-bargained case in which the punishment assessed does not exceed the plea agreement, a defendant may appeal only those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or after obtaining the trial court's permission to appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2); Griffin v. State, 145 S.W.3d 645, 648-49 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004); Cooper v. State, 45 S.W.3d 77, 80 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001). The trial court's certification of appellant's right to appeal in this case states that this is a plea-bargained case and appellant has no right to appeal. The record supports the correctness of the certification. Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 614-15 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We must dismiss an appeal if the trial court's certification shows there is no right to appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).

We note that appellant also waived his right to appeal. See Buck v. State, 45 S.W.3d 275, 278 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, no pet.).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Nuchia, Hanks, and Bland.

Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.