Francisco Morfin v. State
Francisco Morfin v. State
Opinion
Opinion issued March 1, 2007
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
____________
NO. 01-06-01149-CR
____________
FRANCISCO MORFIN, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 240th District Court
Fort Bend County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 41863
MEMORANDUM OPINION
We lack jurisdiction to hear this appeal. The trial court sentenced appellant, Francisco Morfin, and signed a final judgment in this case on October 17, 2006. Appellant did not file a motion for new trial, and therefore the deadline for filing a notice of appeal was November 16, 2006, 30 days after sentencing. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1).
Appellant filed a notice of appeal on November 22, 2006, six days after the deadline. Although the notice of appeal was filed within the 15-day time period for filing a motion for extension of time to file notice of appeal, no such motion for extension of time was filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3.
An untimely notice of appeal fails to vest the appellate court with jurisdiction to hear the case. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 209-10 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Douglas v. State, 987 S.W.2d 605, 605-06 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, no pet.).
We therefore dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
All pending motions are denied as moot.
It is so ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack. and Justices Jennings and Bland.
Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.