Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2007

Jeremy Scott Burkett v. Daniel R. Legault, and Fantasy Ranch, Inc. by and Through Harry Freeman

Jeremy Scott Burkett v. Daniel R. Legault, and Fantasy Ranch, Inc. by and Through Harry Freeman
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided August 2, 2007

Jeremy Scott Burkett v. Daniel R. Legault, and Fantasy Ranch, Inc. by and Through Harry Freeman

Opinion

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                               COURT OF APPEALS

                                                 SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                                                FORT WORTH

 

 

                                        NO. 2-07-212-CV

 

 

JEREMY SCOTT BURKETT                                                    APPELLANT

 

                                                   V.

 

DANIEL R. LEGAULT, AND                                                     APPELLEES

FANTASY RANCH, INC. BY                                                  

AND THROUGH HARRY FREEMAN

 

 

                                              ------------

 

           FROM THE 348TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

 

                                              ------------

 

                                MEMORANDUM OPINION[1]

 

                                              ------------


Appellant Jeremy Scott Burkett attempts to appeal from a trial court order granting summary judgment in favor of Fantasy Ranch, Inc.  On June 25, 2007, we notified Appellant that we were concerned that this court may not have jurisdiction over this appeal because the order granting summary judgment in favor of Fantasy Ranch, Inc. is a partial summary judgment that does not dispose of all parties in the case, and it does not appear to be a final judgment or an interlocutory order.  See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 192-93 (Tex. 2001).  Additionally, we informed Appellant that the trial court had confirmed that no severance order has been signed severing Appellant=s case against Fantasy Ranch, Inc. from Appellant=s case against Daniel R. Legault.  We also informed Appellant that the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless Appellant or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.  We have not received any response to the jurisdiction letter.

Because there is no final judgment or appealable interlocutory order, we dismiss this case for want of jurisdiction.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a); 43.2(f).

 

 

PER CURIAM

 

 

PANEL D:  HOLMAN, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

 

DELIVERED:  August 2, 2007



[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.