Thomas Jay Dangerfield v. Jacob Ormsby and Academy, Ltd.
Thomas Jay Dangerfield v. Jacob Ormsby and Academy, Ltd.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 2-07-033-CV
THOMAS JAY DANGERFIELD APPELLANT
V.
JACOB ORMSBY AND ACADEMY, LTD. APPELLEES
----------
FROM THE 342 ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
----------
MEMORANDUM OPINION (footnote: 1) AND JUDGMENT
----------
On April 10, 2007, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). T EX. R. A PP. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. We have not received any response.
Because appellant’s brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).
Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.
PER CURIAM
PANEL D: LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ.
DELIVERED: May 3, 2007
FOOTNOTES
1:
See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.