Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2007

Fantasy Ranch, Inc. v. City of Arlington, Texas and License and Amortization Appeal Board of the City of Arlington, Texas

Fantasy Ranch, Inc. v. City of Arlington, Texas and License and Amortization Appeal Board of the City of Arlington, Texas
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided January 11, 2007

Fantasy Ranch, Inc. v. City of Arlington, Texas and License and Amortization Appeal Board of the City of Arlington, Texas

Opinion

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                      COURT OF APPEALS

                                       SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                                   FORT WORTH

 

                                        NO. 2-06-312-CV

 

FANTASY RANCH, INC.                                                        APPELLANT

                                                                                                       

 

                                                   V.

 

CITY OF ARLINGTON, TEXAS                                                APPELLEES

AND LICENSE AND AMORTIZATION

APPEAL BOARD OF THE CITY OF

ARLINGTON, TEXAS                                                                           

 

                                               ----------

            FROM THE 342ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

                                               ----------

                  MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT

                                               ----------


On December 4, 2006, we notified appellant that the trial court clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal had informed the court that arrangements had not been made to pay for the clerk=s record as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a)(2).  TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(a)(2).  We stated we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant, within fifteen days, made arrangements to pay for the clerk=s record and provided this court with proof of payment. 

Because appellant has not made payment arrangements for the clerk=s record, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution.   Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b).

In addition, appellee=s Motion to Dissolve Post-Judgment Injunction is GRANTED.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 24.4(a)(4).  The trial court=s orders suspending enforcement of the judgment are hereby vacated.

Appellant shall pay all costs of the appeal, for which let execution issue.

 

PER CURIAM                      

 

 

PANEL D:  LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ.                                      

DELIVERED: January 11, 2007

 



[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.