Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2007

Tonya Walker and Nicholaus Zarate v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services

Tonya Walker and Nicholaus Zarate v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided April 19, 2007

Tonya Walker and Nicholaus Zarate v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-06-00519-CV

Tonya Walker and Nicholaus Zarate, Appellants v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, NO. 05-140-F3, HONORABLE DONALD HIGGINBOTHAM, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The trial court signed a final order terminating appellants’ rights to their four minor children on July 18, 2006. Pursuant to section 263.405 of the family code, appellants’ appeals are governed by the supreme court rules for accelerated appeals in civil cases. See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 263.405(a) (West Supp. 2006). Thus, appellants were required to file their notice of appeal within twenty days after the trial court’s final order was signed, or August 8, 2006. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(b); In re K.A.F., 160 S.W.3d 923, 927 (Tex. 2005), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 483 (2005).

Appellant Tonya Walker filed her notice of appeal on August 25, 2006, and Appellant Nicholaus Zarate filed his notice of appeal on September 5, 2006. Neither appellant filed a motion to extend the deadline for filing notice of appeal as allowed under Tex. R. App. P. 26.3.1 Although

Nor may we imply a motion to extend the deadline for filing notice of appeal, since both appellants’ notices of appeal were filed more than fifteen days after the deadline. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3; Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). both appellants filed motions for new trial, these motions did not operate to extend the deadline for filing a notice of appeal. See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 263.405(c). Because appellants did not file a motion for extension under rule 26.3 and their notices of appeal were not filed within twenty days after the trial court signed the final order terminating appellants’ parental rights, this Court is without jurisdiction to consider appellants’ appeals. See In re K.A.F., 160 S.W.3d at 927. Accordingly, we dismiss appellants’ appeals for want of jurisdiction.

__________________________________________ Jan P. Patterson, Justice Before Justices Patterson, Pemberton and Waldrop Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction Filed: April 19, 2007

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.