Carl Dixon D/B/A Dixon Contracting v. Doug Groves and Patty Groves
Carl Dixon D/B/A Dixon Contracting v. Doug Groves and Patty Groves
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-07-00138-CV
Carl Dixon d/b/a Dixon Contracting, Appellant v. Doug Groves and Patty Groves, Appellees
FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY NO. 06-0046-CC4, HONORABLE JOHN MCMASTER, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The parties have filed a joint motion to vacate the trial court’s judgment and dismiss the case with prejudice to refiling, as agreed to in their Rule 11 settlement agreement. This court has the authority to render judgment effectuating the parties’ agreement. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A). Accordingly, we vacate the trial court’s judgment and dismiss the case with prejudice to refile. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(e) (may vacate and dismiss case).
W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Puryear and Henson Vacated and Cause Dismissed on Joint Motion Filed: April 18, 2007
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.