Jessica Ann MacKey v. State
Jessica Ann MacKey v. State
Opinion
Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.
Pending before this Court is appellant's motion to dismiss her appeal. Appellant and her attorney both have signed the motion. Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). No decision of this Court having been delivered to date, we grant the motion. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. No motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.
James T. Campbell
Justice
Do not publish.
EN-US X-NONE X-NONENO. 07-10-0034-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL C
MARCH 9, 2010
______________________________
ELMER WHITTAKER,
Appellant
V.
REBECCA WHITTAKER,
Appellee
______________________________
FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;
NO. 2009-549,132; HON. STEPHEN JOHNSON, PRESIDING
______________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
______________________________
Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.
Elmer Whittaker perfected this appeal on January 12, 2010. The appellate record was due on or about February 11, 2010. Both the district clerk and court reporter have filed motions to extend the time to file their records because appellant apparently failed to pay or make arrangements to pay for them, as required by Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a)(1)(2) and 35.3(b)(3). By letter dated February 22, 2010, we directed appellant to certify to this court, by March 4, 2010, that he had complied with rule of procedure 35.3(a)(1)(2). So too was he informed that failure to meet that deadline would result in the dismissal of his appeal. To date, this court has not received either the clerk=s record, the reporter=s record, or notification that the records have been paid for or that arrangements have been made for payment. Nor has this court received any request to postpone the dismissal date. Consequently, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.
Per Curiam
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.