Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2007

White Consolidated Industries, D/B/A the Eureka Company v. Irene Richardson

White Consolidated Industries, D/B/A the Eureka Company v. Irene Richardson
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided April 19, 2007

White Consolidated Industries, D/B/A the Eureka Company v. Irene Richardson

Opinion

Becker v. State

COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS




WHITE CONSOLIDATED INDUSTRIES, d/b/a THE EUREKA COMPANY,

Appellant,



v.



IRENE RICHARDSON,



Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§


§



No. 08-05-00322-CV


Appeal from

327th District Court



of El Paso County, Texas



(TC # 2003-4378)

MEMORANDUM OPINION



Pending before the Court is the motion of Appellant, White Consolidated Industries, d/b/a The Eureka Company, to dismiss this appeal pursuant to Tex.R.App.P. 42.1 because the parties have settled all matters in controversy. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. The motion does not reflect that the parties have made an agreement regarding costs. Consequently, we tax the costs of appeal against Appellant. See Tex.R.App.P. 42.1(d)(absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant).



April 19, 2007

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Justice



Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Carr, JJ.

Chew, C.J., not participating

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.