David Bridwell, Jr. v. State
David Bridwell, Jr. v. State
Opinion
On October 4, 2007, we notified the parties that our jurisdiction was not apparent from the notice of appeal, and notified them that the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless we received a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. We received no response from appellant.
The notice of appeal seeks to appeal the trial court's order denying appellant's motion for judgment nunc pro tunc. The trial court's order is not appealable. See Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex. App.--Waco 2002, pet. dism'd)(Court of Appeals does not have jurisdiction over appeal from order denying a request for judgment nunc pro tunc.). We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Accordingly, we hold the order from which appellant appeals is not appealable.
APPEAL DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.
__________________________________
CHARLES KREGER
Justice
Opinion Delivered November 14, 2007
Do not publish
Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Kreger, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.