Pursuant to a plea bargain, appellant Latrenda S. Cartwright pled no contest to assault on a public servant. On November 28, 2005, the trial court found the evidence sufficient to find Cartwright guilty, but deferred further proceedings, placed Cartwright on community supervision for two years, and assessed a fine of $250. On March 10, 2006, the State filed a motion to revoke Cartwright's unadjudicated community supervision. Cartwright pled "not true" to four alleged violations of the conditions of her community supervision. After holding a hearing, the trial court found that Cartwright violated three of the conditions of her community supervision, found Cartwright guilty of assault on a public servant, and assessed punishment at five years of confinement.

Cartwright's appellate counsel filed a brief that presents counsel's professional evaluation of the record and concludes the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). On June 21, 2007, we granted an extension of time for appellant to file a pro se brief. We received no response from appellant. We reviewed the appellate record, and we agree with counsel's conclusion that no arguable issues support an appeal. Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re-brief the appeal. Compare Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial court's judgment. ⁽¹⁾

AFFIRMED.

_________________________________

HOLLIS HORTON

Justice

Submitted on September 21, 2007

Opinion Delivered October 3, 2007

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Horton, JJ.

1. Appellant may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.