Brittney Antwine v. State
Brittney Antwine v. State
Opinion
On July 31, 2007, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution unless arrangements were made for filing the record or the appellant explained why she needed time for filing the record. The appellant did not file a response. It appears that the appellant is not entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.2. There being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to file the record, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
_______________________________
STEVE McKEITHEN
Chief Justice
Opinion Delivered September 12, 2007
Do Not Publish
Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Kreger, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.